New Paper: Intrametropolitan Patterns of Foreclosed Homes
Posted by on May 4, 2009
Intrametropolitan Patterns of Foreclosed Homes: ZIP-Code-Level Distributions of Real-Estate-Owned (REO) Properties during the U.S. Mortgage Crisis
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta: Community Affairs Discussion Paper Series
During the mortgage crisis, community developers, policymakers, and others have become increasingly concerned about the extent to which lender-owned homes, often called real-estate-owned or “REO” properties, have accumulated in their neighborhoods and communities. REO properties are usually vacant and, especially when geographically concentrated, can have destabilizing impacts on neighborhoods and communities. However, due to data challenges, little systematic research has been done on the intrametropolitan distributions of such properties, especially across different metropolitan regions as of November 2008. First, the urban-versus-suburban distribution of REO is found to vary significantly across metropolitan areas. In general, in traditionally weak-market metros—many of which had substantial REO levels before the advent of the national mortgage crisis—REO tend to be relatively concentrated in central cities. Conversely, in regions where REO accumulated more recently and in those with high central-city housing prices, REO tend to be somewhat more suburbanized. Second, while ZIP codes with high REO densities are disproportionately located in central cities, this pattern varies significantly across metropolitan areas. In particular, in the formerly “hot-market” regions where home values have declined rapidly, a large majority of ZIP codes with “severe” REO levels are suburban. Finally, among suburban ZIP codes, those with long commute times experienced larger increases in REO over the November 2006 to 2008 period than those with shorter commute times. The paper concludes with some broad implications for community development policy and planning.
Intrametropolitan Patterns of Foreclosed Homes is available online at http://www.frbatlanta.org/comm_affairs/dp_index.cfm
About the Author: Dan Immergluck is a visiting scholar in community affairs at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and an associate professor of City and Regional Planning at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Beyond his work on foreclosures, Immergluck conducts research on housing markets, fair lending, community development finance, and related public policies. At Georgia Tech, he teaches courses in housing policy, real estate finance, and research methods. Immergluck publishes regularly in scholarly journals and has testified before Congress, the Federal Reserve Board, and state and local legislatures.
About the Discussion Paper Series: The Discussion Paper Series of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s Community Affairs Department addresses emerging and critical issues in community development. Its purpose is to provide timely information on topics that will be useful to the many actors involved in community development—governments, nonprofits, financial institutions, beneficiaries and others. To subscribe to the Discussion Paper Series go to http://www.frbatlanta.org/webscriber/user/dsp_login.cfm
More in "New Resources"
- SSIR Guide to Influencing Public Policy
- New Report: How Many Households May Be at Risk of Eviction Because of the COVID-19 Pandemic
- 120-Day Update on Pathways to Reform, Transformation, and Reconciliation
Stay Current in Philly's Higher Education and Nonprofit Sector
We compile a weekly email with local events, resources, national conferences, calls for proposals, grant, volunteer and job opportunities in the higher education and nonprofit sectors.